- MACSPICE VOLTAGE DIVIDER CODE MAC OS X
- MACSPICE VOLTAGE DIVIDER CODE PATCH
- MACSPICE VOLTAGE DIVIDER CODE CODE
- MACSPICE VOLTAGE DIVIDER CODE FREE
* Alt can be used as the compose character on international keyboards. * Overridden to handle mac conversion from Alt to Ctrl and vice versa so The method, processKeyBinding has the suspicious JavaDoc:
MACSPICE VOLTAGE DIVIDER CODE CODE
Tracking through the stack trace, I think the issue may be because of some code in .java around line 224. So as far as the actions are concerned, there were two keystrokes, one with Ctrl and one with Alt even though the Alt combination was never pressed. Looking at the event modifiers, I can see that the Move action is fired with 195 while the Copy is fired with 585 indicating Ctrl+Shift and Alt+Shift respectively. The ActionFactory.CopySelectionElseLineDownAction is being fired immediately after the ActionFactory.MoveSelectionElseLineDownAction even when only Ctrl+Shift+DOWN is pressed. I did some debugging and I think I narrowed down the problem a little. Is there an easy setup to debug this? I'm willing to give it a shot if you can point me to the general area in the source where the keybindings are applied in the editor. I wonder if two key press events are being generated or if the check for which metakeys are pressed is too broad in this case? This implies to me that the issue isn't with the Ctrl+Shift+DOWN binding, but somehow the Alt+Shift+DOWN binding is getting triggered when Ctrl is pressed. I get proper functionality with the move functionality and obviously duplicate functionality doesn't work. I get duplicate lines when using the move functionality. Move Line(s) Down (alt): Ctrl+Shift+KP_DOWNĭuplicate Line(s) Down: Alt+Shift+KP_DOWNĭuplicate Line(s) Down (alt): Alt+Shift+DOWN It appears to be some kind of interaction between the "Move Line(s).
MACSPICE VOLTAGE DIVIDER CODE FREE
> "Mission Control" from Ctrl+Up should also free the Ctrl+Shift+Up. > feature (on Snow Leopard similar for Shift+expose etc.). > "Mission Control" and Shift is generally causing a slow motion of the
> assigned (in System Preferences -> Keyboard -> Keyboard Shortcuts) to > I have searched over internet and found that there should be Ctrl+Up (In reply to Miloslav Metelka from comment #26)
MACSPICE VOLTAGE DIVIDER CODE MAC OS X
System: Mac OS X version 10.8.5 running on x86_64 UTF-8 en_US (nb) Runtime: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment 1.8.0-ea-b117
MACSPICE VOLTAGE DIVIDER CODE PATCH
Updates: NetBeans IDE is updated to version NetBeans 7.4 Patch 1 Line duplicated upon moving with Ctrl-Shift-Up/Down
Left them active, checked that they worked. I had Mission Control (Ctrl-up) and Application Windows (Ctrl-down) disabled as well, however I gave it a try and remapped them to Cmd-/ and Cmd-\, respectively. right and left arrows are recognized, but up and down aren't. > in the shortcut assignment field, it just goes up and down in the select
> Another bummer: After deleting the Shift+Meta+DOWN and UP showrtcuts i > (In reply to nickroklaus from comment #20) CTRL+SHIT+UP just fires navigation in combos. When pressing the up and down arrow in the shortcut assignment field, it just goes up and down in the select box. > same Keymap tab, click Manage Profiles & then Restore Defaults (NetBeansĪnother bummer: After deleting the Shift+Meta+DOWN and UP showrtcuts i cannot assign these shortcuts anymore. If you change your mind, you can always search for the shortcuts > for the corresponding Duplicate Line(s) shortcuts. add alternatives Shift+Meta+DOWN and Shift+Meta+UP clear shortcuts Shift+Meta+UP and Shift+Meta+DOWN. > shortcut for duplicating lines with the keyboard. > this point, the bug in question is obviated, but you've lost the main clear shortcuts Alt+Shift+DOWN and Alt+Shift+UP. > In Netbeans 7.4 Preferences (Options), Keymap: > more mac-standard 'Extend Selection to Beggining/End of Document' with > Up/Down' back to the way it to my knowledge worked in 7.3.1. > This is another workaround that when followed puts 'Duplicate Line(s) (In reply to nickroklaus from comment #20)
0 kommentar(er)
